Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

An Integrative Model of Green Sustainable Science, Environmental Awareness, and Eco-Friendly Practices in Community Life

Md Masud Morshed ORCID
University of Science and Technology Chittagong ROR
Thailand
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Sustainable community life requires aligning scientific knowledge, environmental awareness, and daily eco-friendly behavior. However, the connection between what communities know, believe, and practice often remains inconsistent. This study aims to examine how Green Sustainable Science is integrated into community life, assess environmental awareness levels, and identify environmentally friendly practices that support sustainability in daily activities.

    Methodology: This study used a qualitative case study approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation. The instruments included semi-structured interview guides, observation sheets, and documentation notes. Data analysis employed the Miles and Huberman interactive model with reduction, display, and conclusion stages.

    Main Findings: Findings show that sustainability concepts have been integrated into community routines, although understanding varies and tends to be practical in nature. Environmental awareness ranges from moderate to high among active groups but remains inconsistent in others. Eco-friendly behaviors such as waste sorting, reducing plastic use, and saving energy are present but constrained by limited facilities and policy support. These findings reveal that sustainable behavior emerges from the interaction between knowledge, awareness, and structural conditions, highlighting the need for stronger community programs and better environmental infrastructure.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study provides new insights into how communities integrate sustainability concepts beyond formal education and policy frameworks. Its originality lies in examining the direct link between scientific knowledge, awareness, and daily life practices. The findings contribute to advancing strategies for community empowerment and contextual environmental programs.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “An Integrative Model of Green Sustainable Science, Environmental Awareness, and Eco-Friendly Practices in Community Life”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–32, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v7i1.2134.

    More Citation Formats

  • 179
    Abstract views
    152
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. V. K. Srivani Maddala, “Green pest management practices for sustainable buildings: Critical review,” Sci. Prog., vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0036850419842459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0036850419842459
    2. F. Taghikhah, A. Voinov, N. Shukla, and T. Filatova, “Integrated modeling of extended agro-food supply chains : A systems approach,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 288, no. 3, pp. 852–868, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.06.036
    3. E. Mclennon, V. Kankarla, B. Dari, G. Jha, and D. Sihi, “Regenerative agriculture and integrative permaculture for sustainable and technology driven global food production and security,” Agron. J., vol. 113, no. July, pp. 4541–4559, 2021, doi: 10.1002/agj2.20814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20814
    4. S. E. Bibri, “The eco-city and its core environmental dimension of sustainability: Green energy technologies and their integration with data-driven smart solutions,” Energy Informatics, vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1186/s42162-020-00107-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-020-00107-7
    5. H. S. Koay, Kian Yeik Cheah, Chee wei Lom, “An integrated model of consumers’ intention to buy second-hand clothing,” Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manag., vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 1358–1377, 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJRDM-10-2021-0470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2021-0470
    6. A. Dwivedi, D. Agrawal, A. Jha, M. Gastaldi, S. Kumar, and P. Idiano, “Addressing the Challenges to Sustainable Initiatives in Value Chain Flexibility : Implications for Sustainable Development Goals,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 22, no. s2, pp. 179–197, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40171-021-00288-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-021-00288-4
    7. M. A. Irshad et al., “Exploring the antifungal activities of green nanoparticles for sustainable agriculture: a research update,” Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric., vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40538-024-00662-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40538-024-00662-1
    8. M. Rambu Atahau, Apriani Dorkas Sakti, Imanuel Madea Huruta, Andrian Dolfriandra Kim, “Gender and renewable energy integration: The mediating role of green-microfinance,” J. Clen. Prod., vol. 10, no. October, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128536. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128536
    9. W. L. Filho, I. Rimi, and A. Mark, “Governance in the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals in higher education : global trends,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 3, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10668-023-03278-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03278-x
    10. S. E. Bibri, “Data-driven smart eco-cities and sustainable integrated districts: A best-evidence synthesis approach to an extensive literature review,” Eur. J. Futur. Res., vol. 9, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4
    11. S. Moski, Elliott Fitho, Walter Leal Sehnem, “Education for sustainable development in higher education institutions: an approach for effective interdisciplinarity,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Edication, vol. 24, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-07-2021-0306
    12. V. D. Angelo, F. Cappa, and E. Peruffo, “Green manufacturing for sustainable development : The positive effects of green activities , green investments , and non-green products on economic performance,” Bus. Strateg. Environmnet, vol. 32, no. July, pp. 1900–1913, 2023, doi: 10.1002/bse.3226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3226
    13. S. E. Bibri, A. Alexandre, A. Sharifi, and J. Krogstie, “Environmentally sustainable smart cities and their converging AI , IoT , and big data technologies and solutions : an integrated approach to an extensive literature review,” Energy Informatics, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2–39, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s42162-023-00259-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42162-023-00259-2
    14. C. Boix-fayos and J. De Vente, “Challenges and potential pathways towards sustainable agriculture within the European Green Deal,” Agric. Syst., vol. 207, no. March 2022, p. 103634, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103634
    15. N. Linder, M. Giusti, K. Samuelsson, and S. Barthel, “Pro-environmental habits : An underexplored research agenda in sustainability science,” Ambio, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 546–556, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01619-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01619-6
    16. H. B. John, M. Agrawal, P. Nema, A. Hasan, I. K. Rakhra, and A. Singh, “Green growth: a bibliometric analysis of digital innovation and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs),” J. Innov. Entrep., vol. 14, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s13731-025-00473-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00473-0
    17. K. Kohl et al., “A whole-institution approach towards sustainability : a crucial aspect of higher education’ s individual and collective engagement with the SDGs and beyond,” Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0398
    18. A. Bongardt, “The European Green Deal : More than an exit strategy to the pandemic crisis ,a building block of a sustainable european economic model,” J. Common Mark. Stud., vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 170–185, 2022, doi: 10.1111/jcms.13264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13264
    19. Y. Xiao, M. Lin, and L. Wang, “Impact of green digital finance on sustainable development: evidence from China’s pilot zones,” Financ. Innov., vol. 10, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40854-023-00552-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00552-9
    20. S. E. Bibri, “Data-driven smart sustainable cities of the future : urban computing and intelligence for strategic , short-term, and joined-up planning,” Comput. Urban Sci., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1–29, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43762-021-00008-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-021-00008-9
    21. A. T. Qumsani, “The contribution of microorganisms to sustainable development: towards a green future through synthetic biology and systems biology,” J. Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appl. Sci., no. 0123456789, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43994-024-00180-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00180-8
    22. M. Fissi, Silvia Romolini, Alberto Gore, Elena Contri, “The path toward a sustainable green university: The case of the University of Florence,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 10, no. january, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123655
    23. D. Kumar and N. P. Bassill, “Analysing trends of computational urban science and data science approaches for sustainable development,” Comput. Urban Sci., vol. 33, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43762-024-00142-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-024-00142-0
    24. B. J. Ellis, M. A. Sheridan, J. Belsky, and K. A. Mclaughlin, “Why and how does early adversity influence development ? Toward an integrated model of dimensions of environmental experience,” Davelopment and Psychapathology, vol. 34, pp. 447–471, 2022, doi: 10.1017/S0954579421001838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579421001838
    25. M. Larsen, Vibeke Grupe Tolli, Nicola Sattrup, Peter Andreas Sattrup Birkved, “What are the challenges in assessing circular economy for the built environment? A literature review on integrating LCA, LCC and S-LCA in life cycle sustainability assessment, LCSA,” J. Build. Eng., vol. 1, no. june, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104203
    26. R. Raman, D. Pattnaik, H. H. Lathabai, C. Kumar, K. Govindan, and P. Nedungadi, “Green and sustainable AI research: an integrated thematic and topic modeling analysis,” J. Big Data, vol. 11, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s40537-024-00920-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00920-x
    27. Y. Xie et al., “Sustainable and green extraction of citrus peel essential oil using intermittent solvent-free microwave technology,” Bioresour. Bioprocess., vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s40643-025-00885-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-025-00885-6
    28. C. Man Seong, T. Chi Hau, T. Chun Cheng, and T. Booi Chen, “Impacts of green curriculum exposure and sustainability awareness on green entrepreneurship intention among Malaysian university students: The mediating role of self-efficacy,” Ind. High. Educ., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 379–394, 2025, doi: 10.1177/09504222251354885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222251354885
    29. Q. Fang, Xuening Li, Jingwei Ma, “Integrating green infrastructure, ecosystem services and nature-based solutions for urban sustainability: A comprehensive literature review,” Sustain. Cities Soc., vol. 98, no. 10, pp. 48–43, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104843
    30. M. F. Jalil, A. H. Bin Md Isa, D. A. B. Awang Marikan, and M. bin Jais, “Sharing is caring: Exploring digital knowledge sharing and SMEs’ green innovative performance through the mediating role of green technology dynamism,” Int. J. Eng. Bus. Manag., vol. 17, pp. 1–19, 2025, doi: 10.1177/18479790251359378. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/18479790251359378
    31. A. Raj, M. K. Jhariya, A. Banerjee, R. S. Meena, N. Khan, and S. K. Yadav, “Ecological wisdom for natural resources management and sustainability,” Natural resources conservation and advances for sustainability, pp. 219-241, 2022, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00017-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822976-7.00017-X
    32. M. Shimabukuro, T. Toki, H. Shimabukuro, Y. Kubo, S. Takahashi, and R. Shinjo, “Development and application of an environmental education tool (board game) for teaching integrated resource management of the water cycle on coral reef islands,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 24, pp. 16562, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142416562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416562
    33. M. I. Tanveer, M. Y. Yusliza, and O. Fawehinmi, “Green HRM and hospitality industry: challenges and barriers in adopting environmentally friendly practices,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 121-141, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JHTI-08-2022-0389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-08-2022-0389
    34. Y. F. Zhang, M. X. Ji, and X. Z. Zheng, “Digital Economy, Agricultural Technology Innovation, and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity,” SAGE Open, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231194388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194388
    35. N. Khalil, S. N. Che Abdullah, S. N., Haron, and M. Y. Hamid, “A review of green practices and initiatives from stakeholder’s perspectives towards sustainable hotel operations and performance impact,” Journal of Facilities Management, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 653-682, 2024, doi: . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFM-03-2022-0025
    36. A. N. Khan, “Elucidating the effects of environmental consciousness and environmental attitude on green travel behavior: Moderating role of green self‐efficacy,” Sustainable Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 2223-2232, 2024, doi: 10.1002/sd.2771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2771
    37. H. Alofaysan, M. Radulescu, I. Dembińska, and K. Si Mohammed, “The effect of digitalization and green technology innovation on energy efficiency in the European Union,” Energy Explor. Exploit., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1747–1762, 2024, doi: 10.1177/01445987241253621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01445987241253621
    38. S. K. Vishnoi, S. Mathur, V. Agarwal, N. Virmani, and S. Jagtap, “What drives Generation Z to choose green apparel? Unraveling the impact of environmental knowledge, altruism and perceived innovativeness,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 2473986, 2025, doi: 10.1080/19397038.2025.2473986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2025.2473986
    39. S. M. Constantino, M., Schlüter, E. U. Weber, and N. Wijermans, “Cognition and behavior in context: a framework and theories to explain natural resource use decisions in social-ecological systems,” Sustainability Science, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1651-1671, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11625-021-00989-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00989-w
    40. X. Zhang, X. E. Zhang, and L. Yang, “Does green entrepreneurial orientation improve the sustainable performance of agribusiness? evidence from China,” SAGE Open, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1–19, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241271110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241271110
    41. M. M. Sabbir, and K. M. R. Taufique, “Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non‐cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 110-128, 2022, doi: 10.1002/bse.2877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2877
    42. G. Caniglia, C. Lüderitz, T. von Wirth, I. Fazey, B. Martín-López, K. Hondrila,... and D. J. Lang, “A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 93-100, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00616-z
    43. Colombo, S. L., Chiarella, S. G., Lefrançois, C., Fradin, J., Raffone, A., & Simione, L. (2023). Why knowing about climate change is not enough to change: A perspective paper on the factors explaining the environmental knowledge-action gap. Sustainability, 15(20), 14859, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152014859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014859
    44. E. Elpisah, “Towards Inclusive growth: Community-Centered management strategies for SMEs,” Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29-39, 2023, doi: 10.52970/grcsd.v3i1.606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52970/grcsd.v3i1.606
    45. S. G. Hernandez, E. West-Frazier, D. Khalil, E. McAuley, M. Saldon, L. Verklan-McInnes, and S. Tankersley, “Evaluation capacity building: Advancing community-centered solutions to substance use health inequities in Chicago. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, vol. 53, pp. 1-22, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10852352.2025.2495376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2025.2495376
    46. I. E. Syafmaini, “The role of social communities in empowering communities through the transformation of waste into marketable products,” Journal of Character and Environment, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 20-37, 2025, doi: 10.61511/jocae.v3i1.2025.1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61511/jocae.v3i1.2025.1994
    47. H. Sadeh, “Fostering Eco-Friendly consumption: Advancing Sustainable practices in Palestine,” Technium Soc. Sci. J., vol. 68, pp. 332, 2025, doi: 10.47577/tssj.v68i1.12381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v68i1.12381
    48. C. F. Rizanti, and R. Djuwita, “Environmental Psychology–psychological motivation towards pro-environmental behavior,” Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1755-1762, 2025, doi: 10.58344/jii.v4i5.6506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v4i5.6506
    49. T. Purnamasari, “Enhancing SMEs as service elements: Exploring Community-Centered management strategies,” Golden Ratio of Community Services and Dedication, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 57-68, doi: 10.52970/grcsd.v4i2.592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52970/grcsd.v4i2.592
    50. Toye, S. A., Uygur, M. R., & Peyravi, B. (2025). Exploration of social dimensions of sustainable behavior. Business: Theory and Practice, 26(1), 182-201, 2025, doi: 10.3846/btp.2025.22971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2025.22971

Categories