Integrated Science Education Journal
Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

SINTA

6.1

Impact

GScholar

18

H-Index

Integrated Science Education Journal

an Open Access Journal

The Effects of Chemistry Virtual Laboratories in Academic Achievement of Secondary Level Learners: A Meta-Analysis

Richelle Castro
Bulacan State University ROR
Philippines
richelle.castro@bulsu.edu.ph
Share

  • Purpose of the study: Chemistry education is continuously improving to provide appropriate learning for the students. The dynamic shaping of technology in the education induces innovative strategies including the utilization of virtual laboratories. This study explores the topic of examining the effectiveness of virtual laboratories in improving learner’s academic achievement in secondary level chemistry.

    Methodology: To facilitate the meta-analysis, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was used. Only 17 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Using the Review Manager Version (RevMan) 5.4 software, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to measure the effect of virtual laboratory in enhancing learners’ achievement.

    Main Findings: The meta-analysis discovered the effect size of SMD = 0.98 which can be interpreted as positively large effect size of virtual laboratories in the academic achievement. Sub-groping was also utilized in this study due to the heterogeneous collected data which revealed the effect sizes according to the region, grade level, topic in chemistry, and duration of implementation.

    Novelty/Originality of this study: This study aims to synthesize current studies on the use of virtual laboratories in chemistry that focus on secondary-level students. This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive overview for the teachers, researchers, and policy-makers as a basis for the effectiveness of virtual laboratory integration in education. This may help the chemistry instructors design appropriate strategies for utilizing virtual simulations.

  • How to cite

    [1]
    “The Effects of Chemistry Virtual Laboratories in Academic Achievement of Secondary Level Learners: A Meta-Analysis”, In. Sci. Ed. J, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–37, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1379.

    More Citation Formats

  • 4039
    Abstract views
    1095
    Downloads

    Metrics — Badges

    1. E. Kaya, S. Erduran, B. Aksoz, and S. Akgun, “Reconceptualised family resemblance approach to nature of science in pre-service science teacher education,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 21–47, 2019, doi: 10.1080/09500693.2018.1529447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1529447
    2. L. Chen and S. Xiao, “Perceptions, challenges and coping strategies of science teachers in teaching socioscientific issues: A systematic review,” Educational Research Review, vol. 32, p. 100377, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100377
    3. E. Purwaningsih, S. P. Sari, A. M. Sari, and A. Suryadi, “The Effect of STEM-PjBL and Discovery Learning on Improving Students’ Problem-Solving Skills of Impulse and Momentum Topic,” JPII, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 465–476, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.26432
    4. S. Criollo-C, A. Guerrero-Arias, Á. Jaramillo-Alcázar, and S. Luján-Mora, “Mobile Learning Technologies for Education: Benefits and Pending Issues,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, p. 4111, 2021, doi: 10.3390/app11094111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11094111
    5. O. N. Cecilia, C.-U. Bernedette, A. E. Emmanuel, and A. N. Hope, “Enhancing students academic performance in Chemistry by using kitchen resources in Ikom, Calabar,” Educ. Res. Rev, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 19–26, 2020, doi: 10.5897/ERR Kamolovna.3810. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2019.3810
    6. Y. Yustina, W. Syafii, and R. Vebrianto, “The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking skills through online learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic,” JPII, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 408–420, 2020, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706
    7. M. J. N. Mendezabal, “Study habits and attitudes: The road to academic success,” Open Science Repository Education, no. open-access, p. e70081928, 2013, doi: 10.7392/Education.70081928.
    8. Y. Rahmawati, E. Taylor, P. C. Taylor, A. Ridwan, and A. Mardiah, “Students’ engagement in education as sustainability: implementing an ethical Dilemma-STEAM teaching model in chemistry learning,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 6, p. 3554, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14063554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063554
    9. C. L. Foronda, M. Fernandez-Burgos, C. Nadeau, C. N. Kelley, and M. N. Henry, “Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018,” Sim Healthcare, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2020, doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000411
    10. J. J. Serrano-Perez et al., “Traditional vs. virtual laboratories in health sciences education,” Journal of Biological Education, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 36–50, 2023, doi: 10.1080/00219266.2021.1877776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1877776
    11. M. L. Santos, and M. Prudente, “Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Science Education: A Meta-Analysis,” IJIET, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 150–156, 2022, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1598
    12. R. F. Schmid et al., “The effects of technology use in postsecondary education: A meta-analysis of classroom applications,” Computers & Education, vol. 72, pp. 271–291, 2014. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.002
    13. R. P. Antonio and R. R. Castro, “Effectiveness of virtual simulations in improving secondary students’ achievement in physics: A meta-analysis,” International Journal of Instruction, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 533–556, 2023. doi:10.29333/iji.2023.16229a DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16229a
    14. C.-H. Chen and Y.-C. Yang, “Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators,” Educational Research Review, vol. 26, pp. 71–81, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
    15. D. Fadda, C. Salis, and G. Vivanet, “About the efficacy of virtual and remote laboratories in STEM education in Secondary School: A second-order systematic review,” Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal), no. 26, 2022. doi:10.7358/ecps-2022-026-fadd DOI: https://doi.org/10.7358/ecps-2022-026-fadd
    16. S. Gopalakrishnan and P. Ganeshkumar, “Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare,” J Family Med Prim Care, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 9, 2013, doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.109934. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109934
    17. N. Mikolajewicz and S. V. Komarova, “Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide,” Front. Physiol, vol. 10, p. 203, 2019, doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00203
    18. D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
    19. A. A. Funa, M. S. Prudente, and Science Education Department, De La Salle University-Manila, Philippines, maricar.prudente@dlsu.edu.ph, “Effectiveness of problem-based learning on secondary students’ achievement in science: A Meta-Analysis,” INT J INSTRUCTION, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 69–84, 2021, doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.1445a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1445a
    20. S. Nakagawa and I. C. Cuthill, “Effect size, confidence interval and statistical significance: a practical guide for biologists,” Biological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 591–605, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00027.x
    21. L. Plonsky and F. L. Oswald, “How Big Is ‘Big’? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research,” Language Learning, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 878–912, 2014, doi: 10.1111/lang.12079. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
    22. W. L. Lu, L. Jansen, W. J. Post, J. Bonnema, J. C. Van De Velde, and G. H. De Bock, “Impact on survival of early detection of isolated breast recurrences after the primary treatment for breast cancer: a meta-analysis,” Breast Cancer Res Treat, vol. 114, no. 3, pp. 403–412, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-0023-4
    23. N. J. Ahmad, N. Yakob, M. A. H. Bunyamin, N. Winarno, and W. H. Akmal, “The effect of interactive computer animation and simulation on students’ achievement and motivation in learning electrochemistry,” JPII, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–324, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v10i3.26013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.26013
    24. S. S. Aldosari, B. Ghita, and D. Marocco, “A gesture-based educational system that integrates simulation and molecular visualization to teach chemistry,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 17, no. 04, pp. 194–211, 2022. doi:10.3991/ijet.v17i04.26503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i04.26503
    25. A. Chado, S. MOHAMMED, and B. Dalhatu, “Effects of virtual laboratory instructional strategy on students’achievement in chemistry practical among senior secondary schools in minna metropolis, Niger State,” Nov. 2021, doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.6849603.
    26. S.-Y. Chen and S.-Y. Liu, “Using augmented reality to experiment with elements in a chemistry course,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 111, p. 106418, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106418
    27. G. W. Hodges, L. Wang, J. Lee, A. Cohen, and Y. Jang, “An exploratory study of blending the virtual world and the laboratory experience in secondary chemistry classrooms,” Computers & Education, vol. 122, pp. 179–193, 2018. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.003
    28. F. Jabeen and M. T. Afzal, “Effect of simulated chemistry practicals on students’ performance at secondary school level,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 119, 2020. doi:10.22555/joeed.v7i1.2600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i1.2600
    29. R. R. Jornales, “Effectiveness of Physics Education Technology (PhET) Interactive Simulations in Teaching Physical Science,” International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR).
    30. W. J. Mihindo, S. W. Wachanga, and Z. O. Anditi, “Effects of Computer-Based Simulations Teaching Approach on Students’ Achievement in the Learning of Chemistry among Secondary School Students in Nakuru Sub County, Kenya,” Journal of education and practice.
    31. O. E. Nkemakolam, O. F. Chinelo, and M. C. Jane, “Effect of computer simulations on secondary school students’ academic achievement in chemistry in Anambra State,” Asian Journal of Education and Training, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 284–289, 2018. doi:10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.284.289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.522.2018.44.284.289
    32. I. Nuić and S. A. Glažar, “The effect of e-learning strategy at primary school level on understanding structure and states of matter,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 16, no. 2, 2019. doi:10.29333/ejmste/114483 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/114483
    33. M. O. Odewumi et al., “Acquiring basic chemistry concepts through virtual learning in Nigerian senior secondary schools,” Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2019. doi:10.23917/ijolae.v2i1.7832 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v2i1.7832
    34. A. I. Oladejo, V. O. Akinola, and N. C. Nwaboku, “Teaching chemistry with computer simulation: Would senior school students perform better,” Crawford journal of multidisciplinary research.
    35. M. M. Ratamun and K. Osman, “The effectiveness of virtual lab compared to physical lab in the mastery of science process skills for chemistry experiment,” Problems of Education in the 21st Century, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 544–560, 2018. doi:10.33225/pec/18.76.544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.544
    36. R. Şeker and T. Kartal, “The effect of computer-assisted instruction on students’ achievement in science education,” Turkish Journal of Education, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 17–17, Jan. 2017. doi:10.19128/turje.279699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19128/turje.279699
    37. I. Hussain, Q. Suleman, M. Naseer-ud-Din, and F. Shafique, “Effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on students’ academic achievement and retention in chemistry at secondary level,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 73, 2017. doi:10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v4i1.1058
    38. K. Winkelmann, W. Keeney-Kennicutt, D. Fowler, M. Lazo Macik, P. Perez Guarda, and C. Joan Ahlborn, “Learning gains and attitudes of students performing chemistry experiments in an immersive virtual world,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 620–634, 2020, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2019.1696844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696844
    39. V. Potkonjak et al., “Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and engineering: A Review,” Computers & Education, vol. 95, pp. 309–327, 2016. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
    40. P. B. Andreatta, M. Hillard, and L. P. Krain, “The impact of stress factors in simulation-based laparoscopic training,” Surgery, vol. 147, no. 5, pp. 631–639, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.071
    41. C. Andrade, “Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis,” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, vol. 81, no. 5, 2020. doi:10.4088/jcp.20f13681 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13681
    42. S. Diwakar, V. K. Kolil, S. P. Francis, and K. Achuthan, “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation among students for laboratory courses - assessing the impact of Virtual Laboratories,” Computers & Education, vol. 198, p. 104758, 2023. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104758 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104758
    43. H. Y. Agustian et al., “Learning outcomes of university chemistry teaching in laboratories: A systematic review of empirical literature,” Review of Education, vol. 10, no. 2Jul. 2022. doi:10.1002/rev3.3360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3360
    44. N. Rizman Herga, B. Čagran, and D. Dinevski, “Virtual Laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in Primary School,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 12, no. 3, 2016. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1224a
    45. H. Y. Agustian and M. K. Seery, “Reasserting the role of pre-laboratory activities in Chemistry Education: A proposed framework for their design,” Chemistry Education Research and Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 518–532, 2017. doi:10.1039/c7rp00140a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00140A
    46. E. H. Korkut and E. Surer, “Visualization in virtual reality: A systematic review,” Virtual Reality, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1447–1480, 2023. doi:10.1007/s10055-023-00753-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-023-00753-8
    47. S. Sullivan, D. Gnesdilow, S. Puntambekar, and J.-S. Kim, “Middle school students’ learning of mechanics concepts through engagement in different sequences of physical and virtual experiments,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1573–1600, Jun. 2017. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1341668 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1341668
    48. Dr. Parlan, S. Ibnu, S. Rahayu, and Dr. Suharti, “The improvement of metacognition of chemistry education students using Metacognitive Learning strategy,” Proceedings of the 1st Annual International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and Education (ICoMSE 2017), 2018. doi:10.2991/icomse-17.2018.46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icomse-17.2018.46
    49. V. K. Kolil and K. Achuthan, “Virtual Labs in chemistry education: A novel approach for increasing student’s laboratory educational consciousness and Skills,” Education and Information Technologies, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 25307–25331, 2024. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12858-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12858-x
    50. R. L. Reyes, K. P. Isleta, J. D. Regala, and D. M. Bialba, “Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 3167–3186, Sep. 2024. doi:10.1111/jcal.13061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13061
    51. A. Ambusaidi, A. Al Musawi, S. Al-Balushi, and K. Al-Balushi, “The ımpact of virtual lab learning experiences on 9th grade students’ achievement and their attitudes towards science and learning by virtual lab,” Journal of Turkish Science Education, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 13-29, 2018.

Categories